Garden Villages: A 19th century solution to a 21st century problem?
CAN GARDEN VILLAGES SOLVE TODAY’S PROBLEMS OR DO THEY MERELY RISK CREATING DISGUISED SUBURBIA?
Turning in his grave or jumping for joy, how would Ebenezer Howard, mastermind of the Garden City movement, react to the latest wave of garden villages to be announced? Unfortunately, it could easily be the former.
Seaham, discussed in IDP’s lecture ‘Place Making in the Garden Viallge Tradition’[1], is a harbour town in North East England, is one of nineteen additional UK developments named in June 2019, that the Government hopes will help reach the target of 300,000 net new homes a year.[2] The principles for garden communities are for high quality place making with local character, where everyone in society can live, work and play.

Home Group and Tolent Construction’s proposal for Seaham Garden Village, developed in conjunction with Durham County Council, will provide 1500 new mixed tenure homes. Community facilities sit at the heart of the masterplan. Green space includes sports facilities, parkland, play areas and 3 miles of footpaths and cycle routes.
Howard’s ideals were bringing nature back into our urban realm, city decentralisation and zoning for different uses. Seaham sounds like it ticks all the right boxes. However arguably Howard was most revolutionary in his engagement with politics and his desire to address the dire living conditions of the time.
Do Seaham and other proposed garden villages really provide a similarly visionary response to our 21st century crises?

Addressing current problems of well-being, seclusion and mental health issues feel lacking from the scheme. Seaham perhaps epitomises our fixation on technology to solve societal problems rather than using design. Jan Gehl’s work, summarised by the Scandinavian proverb ‘people come where people are’[3], states the importance of low intensity interactions to avoid feeling alone. Yet the scheme is still developed around the sterile, sprawling, suburbia model with residential and community buildings distinctly separate. The masterplan hopes to benefit from the latest 5G by utilising ‘digital technology to reduce social isolation’[4]. But does contacting a virtual GP ease pressure on the NHS or, particularly in elderly neighbourhoods, just exacerbate the sense of loneliness? It begs the question of who actually benefits from the technology and why we wish to create a society which reduces human interactions?


Joseph Rowntree’s progressive vision provided every home in New Earswick, York with a fruit tree. This reduced transport miles, increased appreciation of food, provided health benefits for all and gave every house a natural view. This reduces stress and psychologically embodies us within our growing landscape.[7] Accordia, Cambridge, proposed a housing development design shift and designed with the landscape, successfully combining green public and private realms. The result? A strong sense of community remains 10 years on. If designs collaborate between people and our environment, we should champion these, rather than developing for profit.

Debatably the most sustainable way we’ve ever lived was the primitive huts of the savannah, where we were dependent on understanding nature for food, water and shelter to survive.[8] This does not mean the Government should look at reimplementing this. Humanity has advanced, largely detrimentally to our environment. But new symbiotic narratives for living and working need to be proposed for today’s issues, rather than harping back to a bygone, but totally different, era garden villages were intended for.[9]
Whilst many of the decisions at Seaham Garden Village are commendable, if this the epitome for future design, it’s extremely sad. This is a national exemplar, developing a greenfield site. Are we really serious about progressive changes, creating socially and environmentally sustainable communities?
If so, we need more holistic, innovative and radical design proposals.
[1] Massey, M. (2019). Place Making in the Garden Viallge Tradition. Principles and Practice of Urban Design TCP8090, Newcastle Universty. Delivered November 14, 2019.
[2] GOV.UK. Planning Committee Report Durham County Council October 2018 (2019) £3.7 million to fund 5 new garden towns across the country. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/news/37-million-to-fund-5-new-garden-towns-across-the-country (Accessed November 19 2019).
[3] LeGates, R.T., Stout, F. (Eds.). (2015). The City Reader. 6 edition. ed. London ; New York: Routledge.
[4] IDPartnership. (2019) South Seaham Garden Village | IDPartnership. Available at: http://idpartnership.com/portfolio/masterplanning/south-seaham-garden-village/ (Accessed November 19 2019).
[5] GOV.UK. Planning Committee Report Durham County Council October 2018 (2019) £3.7 million to fund 5 new garden towns across the country. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/news/37-million-to-fund-5-new-garden-towns-across-the-country (Accessed November 19 2019).
[6] Dale, S. Yorkshire Post. (2019). Does Derwenthorpe in York live up to the dream of a model village? .Available at: https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/property/does-derwenthorpe-in-york-live-up-to-the-dream-of-a-model-village/ (Accessed December 01 2019).
[7] Pallasmaa, J. (2005). The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses. 2nd Edition edition. ed. Chichester : Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
[8] Steel, C. (2013). Hungry City: How Food Shapes Our Lives. Reissue ed. edition. ed. London: Vintage.
[9] Holliss, F. The Guardian. (2017). To solve the housing crisis we need new ideas, not garden cities | Frances Holliss. URL http://www.theguardian.com/housing-network/2017/feb/09/housing-crisis-worklife-garden-cities (Accessed November 19 2019).
Image Credits
[A] Wikipedia. (2020). Garden City Movement. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garden_city_movement. (Accessed November 18 2019).
[B] Wikipedia. (2020). Garden City Movement. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garden_city_movement. (Accessed November 18 2019).
[C] Wikipedia. (2020). Garden City Movement. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garden_city_movement. (Accessed November 18 2019).
[D] IDPartnership. (2019) South Seaham Garden Village | IDPartnership. Available at: http://idpartnership.com/portfolio/masterplanning/south-seaham-garden-village/ (Accessed November 19 2019).
[E] IDPartnership. (2019) South Seaham Garden Village | IDPartnership. Available at: http://idpartnership.com/portfolio/masterplanning/south-seaham-garden-village/ (Accessed November 19 2019).
[F] Mole Architects. (2019). Marmalade Lane. Available at: https://www.molearchitects.co.uk/projects/housing/k1-cambridge-co-housing. (Accessed November 19, 2019).
[G] Mole Architects. (2019). Marmalade Lane. Available at: https://www.molearchitects.co.uk/projects/housing/k1-cambridge-co-housing. (Accessed November 19, 2019).
[H] IDPartnership. (2019) South Seaham Garden Village | IDPartnership. Available at: http://idpartnership.com/portfolio/masterplanning/south-seaham-garden-village/ (Accessed November 19 2019).
[I] Mikhail Riches. (2019). Goldsmith Street. Available at: http://www.mikhailriches.com/project/goldsmith-street/. (Accessed November 19, 2019).
[J] Mikhail Riches. (2019). Goldsmith Street. Available at: http://www.mikhailriches.com/project/goldsmith-street/. (Accessed November 19, 2019).
[K] Crocker, T. (2008). Accordia. Available at: https://fcbstudios.com/work/view/accordia. (Accessed November 19, 2019).
[L] Crocker, T. (2008). Accordia. Available at: https://fcbstudios.com/work/view/accordia. (Accessed November 19, 2019).